Popular Posts Today

Diberdayakan oleh Blogger.

IBM's Ginni Rometty looks ahead

Written By Emdua on Kamis, 20 September 2012 | 06.06

By Jessi Hempel, senior writer

FORTUNE -- Ginni Rometty's first customer conference as CEO of IBM (IBM) was an unusual affair, especially by Big Blue's buttoned-up standards. The June confab took place in an airy loft in Manhattan's hip Chelsea neighborhood. When the tiny elevator arrived to whisk a group of us to the meeting space, the doors opened and there was Rometty, flanked by a couple of visibly nervous assistants. "Really good to see you!" she said, clasping my hand warmly as her handlers checked their watches. The presentation was about to begin and Rometty still wasn't wearing her microphone. "Isn't this neat?" she asked.

The program started late. At 5-foot-11, with blond hair tucked behind a headband, Rometty, 55, has an almost regal bearing, but on this day she flubbed her entrance, bounding onto the stage before she could be introduced. She laughed it off. When an audience member's ringing cellphone interrupted the events, she joked, "I hope that isn't mine!"

You wouldn't catch Lou Gerstner or Sam Palmisano trying to smooth over someone else's faux pas. Rometty's two predecessors also are unlikely to have hosted a sales meeting in a loft, and they definitely wouldn't have described the proceedings as "neat." But they surely would have approved of Rometty's agenda that June day. She had assembled some familiar faces, the chief information officers who buy billions of dollars of software, tech services, and hardware from IBM (No. 19 on the Fortune 500), but she had also invited their chief marketing officers. (Thus the trendy venue.) Her ambitious -- and yes, unusual -- plan: Get the marketers to use IBM tools to sort their data for nuggets that will help them better reach customers and sell more stuff.

MORE: Ginni Rometty - No. 1 Most Powerful Women in Business

When Rometty (pronounced RAH-metty) became IBM's ninth CEO -- and its first woman chief executive -- she took control of the 19th-largest company in the world by revenue (2011 sales surpassed $107 billion) and, at presstime, the fifth largest by valuation, with a market cap of $235 billion. Her influence on the world of technology and her company's impact on the financial markets earn her the No. 1 spot in Fortune's annual ranking of the Most Powerful Women in Business. She inherits a company with an enviable growth record for its enormous size. Over the past decade, the company has increased profits by an average 16% every year, returning 12% annually to shareholders.

She also needs to live up to almost ridiculously high expectations: IBM has said it will add $20 billion more in revenue growth in the next three years. To put that in perspective, that's a business roughly the size of Nike (NKE), No. 136 on the Fortune 500.

Not that any of this is a surprise to Rometty, a 31-year veteran of IBM who is known to have thick binders of background material and data prepared for her in advance of meetings. Indeed, the most surprising thing about her June customer debut was how loose and improvisational it was. She's not a stiff -- "There's nothing imperious or imperial about her," notes Harvard Business School's Rosabeth Moss Kanter -- but Rometty rarely leaves anything to chance. For example, she declined to be interviewed in person for this article, and would answer questions only via e-mail.

Rometty was at Palmisano's side for much of his decade-long tenure, and became a serious candidate to succeed him about four years ago. And she was personally involved in setting the high bar that she must now clear. She and other senior leaders helped him develop the five-year plan -- dubbed "2015 Roadmap" -- that has IBM targeting more than $125 billion in revenue that year.

For Rometty the challenge of meeting that goal is only partly about inventing new technologies to sell to her existing clients. Growth at IBM's scale also means creating new markets, much the way it did with its Smarter Planet campaign, which sold nontechies such as mayors and police chiefs on the idea of using software to monitor and manage traffic, water systems, and sanitation trucks. Now Rometty is making a similar pitch to marketing executives, promising that technology will change the way they do their jobs. It won't be an easy sell: Marketers are less apt than bureaucrats to be wowed by a charismatic CEO or statistics about petabytes. Many are accustomed to seeing computing as a tool to support their creative endeavors, not the starting point.

The rising star (from left): featured in the IBM 2000 annual report; at an IBM facility in 2002; talking with clients at the CIO-CMO event in June

The rising star (from left): featured in the IBM 2000 annual report; at an IBM facility in 2002; talking with clients at the CIO-CMO event in June

But if she can pull it off, Rometty could initially help change the way corporations communicate with their customers -- and ultimately the way they use technology to build and sell their products. "This is a mindset shift, not a market shift," Rometty explained to the CMOs at the Manhattan event. "It changes everything." She was talking about her customers, but she could just as easily have been talking about IBM.

Rometty had always been a top performer, but she caught the eye of executives at headquarters in Armonk, N.Y., in 2002 when she managed the integration of IBM's $3.5 billion purchase of PricewaterhouseCoopers' IT consulting business. As general manager for IBM's global services division -- the unit that had been at the heart of Gerstner's now legendary resuscitation of the company -- Rometty pushed early for the acquisition and helped negotiate the deal. Overnight IBM became the world's largest consulting business. And then Rometty had to figure out how to integrate 30,000 PwC consultants into her group of 150,000 IBMers.

It was a mishmash of cultures that could have gone horribly wrong, but Rometty managed the integration with a particular sensitivity to its impact on employees. IBM was buying talent, after all. The acquisition wouldn't be successful unless Rometty persuaded the consultants, particularly the 1,000 or so incoming PwC partners, to stick around. She began planning for how the two cultures would fit together even before the dealmakers set financial terms. It was particularly challenging to navigate differing compensation packages. To bring salaries in line with IBM peers', some of PwC's top executive partners had to take as much as a 40% cut in cash compensation -- and forgo perks like club memberships. To make up for the cash reductions, Rometty negotiated stock options that motivated the new employees to stay for at least four years. Ultimately, top performers could earn a higher payout.

She also reached out to all PwC employees personally. The morning the acquisition was announced, they arrived to the blinking red light of a voicemail notification on their phones. "Got to admit feelings were mixed," wrote Tereza Nemessanyi, then a principal consultant at PwC, on her blog. "As a creative type, I was nervous of what I knew as a very rigid culture." The following two-minute message welcomed her personally to IBM, assured her that IBM would retain the best elements of the PwC culture, and most important, got her excited. "Jeez, that woman leaves some seriously good voicemail," wrote Nemessanyi, who tells me she was tempted to move to IBM but ended up staying with PwC's parent.

MORE: Big Blue's big brass - 9 IBM CEOs

This personal approach to leadership is the quality that resonates most with IBMers who have worked for Rometty. It's one reason she has been able to keep talented, entrepreneurial employees like Manoj Saxena, a general manager in charge of commercializing the Watson technologies. A serial entrepreneur, Saxena arrived at IBM in 2006 after the company purchased Webify, his business-to-business software startup. "At first my venture capitalist friends were taking bets on how many quarters I'd stay," he says. Rometty promised Saxena more resources and the opportunity to have a bigger impact at IBM, but she sold Saxena on the company a few years ago when he had a health issue. By that time Rometty was managing several hundred thousand people, but she regularly dropped him a personal e-mail to see how he was feeling. "She leads from both her head and her heart," Saxena says.

Customers get head and heart too. Nick Donofrio, who worked closely with Rometty before his retirement from IBM in 2008, remembers helping her address the concerns of a large Midwestern client sometime around 2005. The client had installed some new IBM products that weren't working well. Rometty called Donofrio, who was then executive vice president of innovation and technology, and told him they had to fly out immediately to see the client in person. The pair spent a day working closely with the client to get the project on track. But a day after they got back to New York, the client's system wasn't working again. Rometty insisted they fly out a second time to help the client fix the problem. "Most people wouldn't go twice," said Donofrio. "They'd send a junior person." As it turned out, it wasn't entirely IBM's fault -- the client hadn't followed instructions. But Rometty said nothing. "Ginni's not thinking, Did we do it wrong?" says Donofrio. "That's not where her head is. She's thinking about the client's success." (Perhaps tellingly, Rometty says she doesn't recall this particular example.) The customer, says Donofrio, has become an even larger customer.

IBM is constantly restructuring its workforce, and the coming changes are sure to test Rometty's leadership style. As IBM becomes more global, it will continue to bolster its ranks internationally, leaving the U.S. (an estimated 105,000 employees today) with a smaller number of workers -- mostly researchers, executives who focus on sales and marketing, and talent coming from startup acquisitions. For many current employees -- some of whom already feel taxed by the long hours and penny-pinching that IBM demands -- the process will be wrenching: They'll need to either reinvent themselves, or more likely, move on. And unlike when she was running global services, Rometty won't be able to leave them all a voicemail.

Rometty, 55, caught the eye of her bosses by successfully integrating PwC's consulting business in 2002.

Rometty, 55, caught the eye of her bosses by successfully integrating PwC's consulting business in 2002.

The former Virginia Nicosia is the oldest of four children raised by a single mom outside Chicago. Her mother, with whom she remains very close, was among her strongest influences. By the time she arrived at Northwestern University in 1975, Rometty had matured into a striking, intelligent student who was popular among her peers and successful in the classroom. She pledged the elite sorority Kappa Kappa Gamma, and her pledge mom, Erin McInerney, remembers they connected in part because both came from modest backgrounds. "Unlike most of the other girls, we'd had summer jobs and were on scholarships and had loans," she said. By senior year, Rometty was sorority president.

While many of her classmates studied the arts, Rometty was one of just a few of women to study computer science. In the late '70s, Northwestern's sole academic computer was so large that the university dedicated an entire building, the Vogelbach Computing Center, to housing it. Rometty and her fellow students learned to program it using punch cards. When Rometty needed help on an assignment, a KKG sister coaxed a fellow student named Craig Berman into tutoring her in exchange for dinner at the sorority house -- probably the only place on campus where students were served meals on tablecloths. One Sunday morning Nicosia appeared in Berman's fourth-floor dorm room, "a statuesque blond" who "kicked aside some dirty clothes stacked near the doorway." She had a list of written questions and programming issues, and when he tried to answer the questions, she pushed him instead to explain his method for reaching the solution. "A lot of people look like they are listening, but she really listened," he says.

Berman, who is now a vice president at Jeffries & Co. (JEF), describes his classmate as quiet, focused, always early, and organized. "If she fell off the sidewalk and into the lake, she would have come out wearing a scuba suit," he says. And she had good advice as well. A professor once marked Berman's homework incorrectly. In class he had an opportunity to show the professor up, proving he had the right answer. When he raised his hand, Rometty shoved it down, whispering, "You'll win your argument in private later or lose it in public now."

Rometty graduated in 1979 with a bachelor of science degree with high honors in computer science and electrical engineering. She had attended Northwestern on a scholarship from General Motors (GM), where she had interned between her junior and senior years, and she moved to Detroit to work for the automaker after graduation. There she met her husband, Mark Rometty, now an oil futures investor. The pair, who do not have children, enjoy scuba diving (as a matter of fact) and the occasional Broadway show together, as well as golfing near their Bonita Springs, Fla., home. (Rometty stays in a hotel-run condo in Westchester County when she is in New York.)

MORE: Interactive - investing in the Most Powerful Women

She credits her husband with being a great support to her. She describes a moment early in her career when her boss asked if she'd like to take a big promotion. She told her manager she didn't feel ready, and asked for the night to think about it. At home she discussed it with her husband. "He just looked at me, and he said, 'Do you think a man would have ever answered that question that way?' " Rometty took the promotion.

In 1981, Rometty took a job in IBM's Detroit office as a systems engineer -- a technical consultant of sorts -- for banking customers. In the decades that followed, she moved up through a series of sales and management jobs, working with clients in all of IBM's most important industries -- banking, insurance, telecommunications, manufacturing, and health care. Before moving into senior management, Rometty spent the '90s working in sales, a job for which her tech prowess and people skills made her uniquely qualified. Salespeople who met their annual sales quotas received commemorative pins and luxurious weekend getaways as a reward for earning membership in the prestigious 100% club. Rometty never missed a year.

Three weeks before Rometty was named CEO last fall, we sat together for an onstage conversation at Fortune's annual Most Powerful Women Summit. By then speculation had begun that IBM would soon announce her promotion. I asked her what she'd learned from Palmisano. Rometty reflected. "What he always says is, 'Nothing is inevitable.' " She went on to explain, "Whatever business you're in -- it doesn't matter -- it's going to commoditize over time. It's going to devalue. You've got to keep moving it to a higher value."

To put it another way, Rometty learned that IBM must keep evolving. There is always a new shift coming in technology, and if she doesn't help IBM become the first to discover and commercialize it, the company will lose its shirt.

It's sage advice that came through experience. The company is still haunted by the near-death experience of the early '90s, when it missed the technology shift to personal computers and came within a quarter of going bankrupt. Palmisano was the first CEO to step into the role after Gerstner turned the company around -- and he responded by making bold research-based decisions about the future of the business, and enforcing maniacal discipline over how those decisions were carried out. Perhaps most important, and somewhat unusual for contemporary corporate culture, he nurtured a consistent team of senior executives -- mostly IBM lifers -- with very little turnover.

Rometty (from left): watching the Masters golf tournament in Augusta, Ga., in April; giving a speech in Beijing last year; with businessman David Koch at the Time 100 Gala this year

Rometty (from left): watching the Masters golf tournament in Augusta, Ga., in April; giving a speech in Beijing last year; with businessman David Koch at the Time 100 Gala this year

IBM likes its leaders to keep a low profile, preferring a ruthless focus on customers to coverage in the press. Earlier this year when the all-male Augusta National Golf Club, which has historically offered membership to CEOs of companies like IBM that sponsor the event, did not offer Rometty a membership, she kept mum about the affair, even as the snub ignited a media firestorm. Though she hasn't explained herself, one gets the sense that her greatest contribution to feminism won't be helped by speaking out on issues so much as making IBM successful. She has a company to run.

So in keeping with IBM's traditional long-term approach to management, Rometty has been fulfilling the goals she helped her predecessor draft in IBM's 2015 Roadmap. To hit the massive $20 billion goal, Rometty has spelled out four high-growth areas for the company to focus on. It will continue the Smarter Planet work, in which it infuses the traditional systems that make our towns and cities work with new forms of computing. Revenue from this initiative jumped 50% last year as IBM began to attach the word "smarter" to new market categories like cities and commerce. The company will also invest in helping companies adopt aspects of cloud computing, and it will supercharge its work in business analytics. Rometty will spend a good deal of her time personally nursing along deals in growth markets, which are expected to provide up to 30% of IBM's revenue by 2015.

To that end, Rometty has been crisscrossing the globe since January. She set an early goal for herself of meeting 100 client CEOs in her first two months, and she quickly surpassed it. In April she traveled to Brazil to spend nearly a week hammering out the details of her first big CEO transaction, a deal with the energy business magnate Eike Batista, who calls her "transparent and straightforward." IBM will take over the IT operations for Batista's EBX Group in a contract that is estimated to be worth $1 billion over the next decade, and it will buy a 20% stake in an EBX subsidiary that provides tech services to industries like mining, energy, and shipbuilding.

MORE: What does power really mean?

As much as Rometty is acting on the strategy Palmisano laid out, she has put her own signature on the company as well. One big challenge with which IBM struggles is its reputation for being slow to execute projects, which are sometimes lumbered by layers of bureaucracy. So Rometty is attempting a fix. IBM's most senior executives have long served on three teams -- operating, technology, and strategy -- to help guide the company. Rometty created a fourth leadership team, the Client Experience Team, which she chairs. There are no senior executives on the team. Rather, she appointed a series of client-facing executives to meet with her once a month. They bring in other business leaders -- recently they hosted Ritz-Carlton chief sales and marketing officer Chris Gabaldon -- to hear how other companies manage customer relationships. Rometty says it's not about "clearing away roadblocks" so much as creating the "signature IBM relationship." IBM hopes it will help the company's reputation with customers as well.

As Rometty marches the company into IBM's second century, technology is again shifting. Rometty says we are entering the "cognitive era" of computing. History has produced only three computing eras so far, she explains. The first encompassed machines that counted and tabulated -- the calculators and punch-card machines that Thomas Watson first manufactured. The second era, which began in 1960, brought programmable computers to market. "Everything you know today -- the iPad in front of you -- is just programmable," Rometty told the audience at that first customer conference. What comes next? "This era is machines that learn."

The best example of this is IBM's Watson supercomputer, which soundly defeated the two men holding the longest Jeopardy! winning streaks. The computer system understands natural language. It can generate hypotheses, recognizing that there are different statistical probabilities for each outcome. And it learns as it goes along, refining its responses. When Rometty talks about the cognitive era of computing, that is what she means.

Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings competes against IBM's Watson supercomputer.

Jeopardy! champ Ken Jennings competes against IBM's Watson supercomputer.

Watson came from IBM's labs, where the company invests an average of $6 billion annually. Now IBM is unleashing Watson on the business world. Longtime IBM customer Lori Beer drove to Yorktown Heights, N.Y., to watch that final match live, and that's where she first met Rometty. Beer, an EVP who oversees tech purchases for health insurer WellPoint (WLP), thought maybe Watson could be useful. She visited IBM Research, and Rometty made several visits to WellPoint. "She actually spent the time to get to know us," Beer says. "She really made sure she understood what the issues are."

By September 2011 the companies had hammered out a deal for WellPoint to use Watson's data crunching to help suggest treatment options and diagnoses to nurses and doctors. When presented with information about a new patient in the future, Watson will look for data on those with similar symptoms, as well as the treatments that have been most successful. It will provide a range of treatment options, going so far as to suggest how likely it is to be right about each selection. Less than a year after the contract was signed, the first pilots were rolled out in August with WellPoint nurses who manage complex patient cases and review treatment requests from medical providers. Meanwhile, Watson's computers are being put through a medical school of sorts, absorbing medical records and other data so that by the end of 2013 they can be deployed in oncology practices to help doctors treat cancer patients.

Rometty, of course, believes that Watson has great promise beyond medicine. That's why she had Beer speak at her first customer conference, the one that brought together technologists and marketers. The predictive nature of the technology could reinvent any company flooded with increasingly large amounts of data -- nowadays basically every business in every industry. But first, Rometty will have to translate the idea to a host of new customers who never fancied themselves all that technically minded. And like the eight men who have run this iconic company before her, she'll have to sell them on it.

This story is from the October 8, 2012 issue of Fortune.

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/hSYEu235YAE/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
06.06 | 0 komentar | Read More

Best stocks to own if you're betting on Romney

If he moves into the White House, Mitt Romney has vowed to overturn President Obama's health care reform laws. While that would introduce a new wave of uncertainty about the future of health care, it would be a sure-fire win for at least one area: medical device companies.

Under Obama's Affordable Care Act, medical device companies, such as Medtronic (MDT, Fortune 500), St. Jude Medical (STJ, Fortune 500) and Stryker (SYK, Fortune 500), would be required to pay a 2.3% excise tax on their U.S. sales, starting Jan. 1.

A Romney win would eliminate that tax, which Wunderlich Securities analyst Greg Simpson said "penalizes companies that are driving most of the innovation in the industry."

Medtronic CEO Bill Hawkins told CNBC earlier this year that the tax could cost his company between $150 million and $200 million annually, and would impact the amount the company could spend on research and development projects, while Stryker interim CEO Curt Hartman predicted the tax would cost his company $130 million a year.

And many analysts say that St. Jude's recent restructuring plan, which includes 300 job cuts and aims to save between $50 million and $60 million, would be used to fund the new tax liability.

NEXT: Defense

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/hWc2Kz9Jryg/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
04.34 | 0 komentar | Read More

Chase's website slowed by glitches

Written By Emdua on Rabu, 19 September 2012 | 15.16

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Chase's website was slow and unavailable for some users for several hours on Wednesday, one day after Bank of America experienced similar issues.

Around 1:40 p.m. ET on Wednesday, Chase's Twitter account tweeted: "Chase.com is experiencing intermittent issues. We're working to restore full connectivity & apologize for any inconvenience." Chase spokesman Patrick Linehan repeated a similar statement, and declined to comment further on the reason for the problems.

Chase's site issues broke out just as Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) was recovering from its own intermittent slowness. Bank of America didn't reveal the cause of its glitches, but both banks recently rolled out changes to their website that could have inadvertently caused a problem.

On blogs and Twitter, some hacker groups were claiming responsibility for the issues at both banks. The problems at both banks began soon after one group posted messages on Pastebin calling for attacks on the banks' sites. The website of the New York Stock Exchange, also mentioned as a target in Tuesday's message, did not suffer any apparent outages.

The favorite weapon for these kinds of cyberattacks is a "distributed denial of service" (DDoS) attack, which directs a flood of traffic to a website and temporarily crashes it by overwhelming its servers. It doesn't actually involve any hacking or security breaches. A DDoS attack would typically cause the type of slowness and intermittent unavailability that both Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Bank of America experienced this week.

But there was no immediate evidence to support the hackers' claims, and several recent ones turned out to be hoaxes. Earlier this month, a person affiliated with the hacktivist collective Anonymous said the group took down the web hosting service GoDaddy, and in June the group UGNazi claimed responsibility for downing Twitter. Both outages were later revealed to be technical issues.

"I can assure you we continuously take proactive measures to secure our systems," Bank of America's spokesman said on Tuesday in response to a question about whether the company had seen any signs of a cyberattack. Chase's spokesman declined to comment about the issue. To top of page

First Published: September 19, 2012: 6:03 PM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/hAlSNkq9SkY/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
15.16 | 0 komentar | Read More

Groupon launches credit-card payments service

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Groupon is throwing down hard in the mobile payment space, with a guarantee that its new Payments service is "the lowest-cost option" for merchants who run a daily deal with the company.

Groupon Payments, which is available through an app for the company's merchants, is the latest entry in the white-hot mobile payments field. Groupon's rate is 1.8% plus 15 cents per swiped transaction for MasterCard (MA, Fortune 500), Visa (V, Fortune 500) and Discover (DFS, Fortune 500) cards. For American Express (AXP, Fortune 500), it's 3% plus 15 cents per transaction.

That's a pretty sweet deal for retailers. The swipe fees that credit cards typically charge can vary from one small business to another, but they usually fall between 2-4% of the transaction for credit cards (debit card rates are typically lower). Shares of Groupon (GRPN) were up more than 7% in midday trading after the announcement. The deal is available to U.S. merchants only, for now.

Can Groupon actually make money on this arrangement, or is it a loss-leader intended to grow the company's discounts business? The company didn't say in its Groupon Payments announcement and didn't immediately respond to a call seeking comment.

In some cases, Groupon Payments severely undercuts even low-cost competitors like Square. The startup, backed by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, lets small business swipe credit cards through a tiny device that attaches to a phone. Square offers two plans for businesses: pay one flat fee of $275 per month, or pay 2.75% per swipe. EBay (EBAY, Fortune 500)-owned PayPal charges 2.7% per swipe.

Square, which has raised more than $200 million in funding and is valued at more than $3.2 billion, is just one of the companies trying to lead the fast-growing mobile payments space. The list also includes Google (GOOG, Fortune 500), which is pushing its Wallet service, and financial services companies like VeriFone (PAY) and NCR (NCR, Fortune 500).

Though Groupon Payments is designed for businesses that run daily deals through the company, a temporary pilot program for non-Groupon merchants offers rates of 2.2% for most cards (3% for American Express) plus 15 cents per swipe. To top of page

First Published: September 19, 2012: 2:01 PM ET

20 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/7gzk4iApQfQ/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
11.36 | 0 komentar | Read More

The wizard of shareholder value

FORTUNE -- I went to see my friend Vronsky, who is trying to keep his corporation on a positive growth curve in spite of, you know, everything. These days that takes faith as well as strategy. So I knew where to find him.

There he was, precisely where I thought he would be: on his knees, praying at the shrine of shareholder value, muttering incantations, burning old strategic plans and sifting through the ashes, seeking wisdom from this unyielding and selfish god.

This weird cult, as I am sure we all know, was founded in the mid-1980s by the original priests of the order, men whose names are now mostly shrouded in mystery. Once viewed as simple raiders, wielders of debt and destruction, and levelers of hundreds of thousands of jobs in corporate villages around the globe, these original Icahnic monks are legend now, but their descendants and acolytes live on, issuing edicts and decrees under the totem of shareholder activism and receiving alms and accolades from their drooling sycophants in the investment community and financial media. It was to an oracle of this cruel and impatient deity that Vronsky was appealing for guidance now.

"O Great One!" Vronsky intoned. His eyes had rolled back in his head, and his face was an unpleasant shade of chartreuse. "It would seem that the best thing we could do at this time is to acquire a smaller firm and consolidate its operations with our own. May we do so?"

The air around the shrine shimmered with an angry red light, and a deep, phlegmy voice belched forth. "What are you talking about?" it boomed. "The Street hates acquisitions! They dilute EPS! Buy back more stock!"

"We are!" said Vronsky. "But at the same time we would like to explore new branding opportunities."

"Branding, schmanding!" yelled the voice in obvious disgust. "When was the last time you raised your dividend!?"

"How about an investment in new talent?" piped Vronsky with pathetic timidity. "We may need to hire lower-level younger people who actually understand social media."

"Fire more people!" the voice rumbled. "Wall Street loves layoffs! Cut expenses! Expand margins! And give us your cash flow!"

"How much of it? Don't we need some of it?" Vronsky was almost weeping now.

"All of it! All! All!" An enormous boom shook the foundations of the temple. A little plaster fell on our heads.

"But All-Seeing and Infinitely Entitled One," he puled, "if you take a longer view, it's clear that what I'm proposing is best for the business in the long term."

"Long term!" the entity fairly shrieked. "Quarter to quarter! Double-digit growth in all measures! Or you will be punished! Bad press! Bad write-ups from my high priests of security analysis! Cash to investors! Cash to me! Me! Hahahahahahaha!"

Vronsky began to sob uncontrollably, melting into a small pool of trembling cartilage on the floor. I'd had about enough of this. I strode to the veiled, shadowy space behind the altar and tore away the curtain that concealed the source of the voice. To my surprise, I found a small, bald man in a cheap button-down short-sleeved shirt and pants whose belted waistband reached up to his armpits. He was munching on stale cookies he had pilfered from a recent annual meeting while frenetically manipulating a huge machine whose obvious purpose was to amplify his voice and issue forth the terrifying lights, smoke, and sound effects.

"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain," he said with a sheepish grin.

"No problem," I said. Then I took my friend out for a nice, tall drink. Tomorrow we start his deprogramming. It won't be easy. The complexities of reality are a poor replacement for the simplicity of faith sometimes.

This story is from the September 24, 2012 issue of Fortune.

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/2PM2hSrmxWg/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.04 | 0 komentar | Read More

Who's better for stocks: Obama or Romney?

FORTUNE -- One of the questions I get asked these days is whether a win by Mitt Romney or by Barack Obama would be better for the stock market. To which the only honest answer is "I have no earthly idea." Any competent and dispassionate market analyst will tell you that the financial and psychological states of the U.S. and world economies are the major factors, and that the President's influence on these matters is far less than most people think it is.

Case in point: George W. Bush. He was a Republican, a free-market guy, right? Stocks, according to the conventional wisdom, should have boomed during his reign. After all, he dropped taxes on investment income to their lowest point in modern history in the name of helping investors and the economy. Well … oops! Rather than being a golden age for stock investors, his tenure was a disaster. The U.S. market lost 25.1% during his two terms, according to statistics assembled for me by Wilshire Associates. Had historical averages held, the market's total return -- capital gains plus reinvested dividends -- would have more than doubled investors' money during the eight years that Bush was in office. Instead, investors ended up with a quarter less than they started with.

MORE: Obama - president ready for a showdown

And guess what? The best first-term presidential market (at least so far) has come during the administration of … Barack Obama, who has been reviled on Wall Street for allegedly crippling corporate America with insults and regulation, and who has pushed through higher taxes on investment income of upper-echelon households. Yet stocks produced a whopping 95.9% total return from Obama's Inauguration through Fortune's mid-September presstime.

Finding Obama at the top isn't what I expected to see when I asked Wilshire to calculate returns by presidential administrations for me. We started with Ronald Reagan because Wilshire didn't begin tracking daily market returns with its Wilshire 5000 index until 1980. That's why Reagan, who took office in 1981, is the first President on our list. (You can find all the numbers in the table to the left.)

If George W. Bush, the investors' supposed friend, produced the worst return of any President starting with Reagan, whose administration showed the best return? No, not Reagan, beloved in some places (and notorious in others) for kicking off our orgy of tax cuts. It was Bill Clinton, who pushed through a hefty tax increase during his first term.

Think about it. Under two Democratic Presidents, stocks have shown the best return, while three Republicans bring up the rear.

Tempting as it is to tweak my more conservative friends with this fact, it would be wrong to attribute the Clinton and Obama returns to their policies and presidencies. Clinton inherited a great economy (and no, I don't attribute it to Reagan's policies as supply-side types do, and neither should you) and left office after the Internet stock bubble burst, but well before it bottomed. Bush inherited a tanking stock market and left amid a financial panic. Does Clinton deserve full credit for everything good during his tenure? Does Bush deserve full blame for everything bad? Yes, if you're an ideologue. No, if you're intellectually honest.

MORE: Mitt Romney's 5-point plan for the economy

Obama took office with stocks at really low levels, which he had nothing to do with. After a sickening two-month drop during which his critics tracked the "Obama market," things stabilized, thanks to coordinated actions by central banks and governments throughout the world. The panic was alleviated, and "Obama market" largely disappeared from public discourse.

About half the gain during Obama's tenure came his first year. By contrast, Reagan had a loss in his first year. Other year-by-year returns have varied all over the lot, as you can see. "There's no pattern here -- it's just random," said Bob Waid, managing director of Wilshire Analytics. "If these were causal relationships, you would see a different pattern."

The bottom line: Go ahead, vote for whichever candidate you want. But don't think that your guy's winning -- or losing -- will determine what happens to the stock market. That's just not how the world works.

This story is from the October 8, 2012 issue of Fortune.

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/U32pVEKCbok/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.04 | 0 komentar | Read More

Apple's iPhone 5: The reviews

The Joy of Tech

FORTUNE -- Apple (AAPL), as usual, chose carefully whom to seed with pre-release review copies of the new iPhone: The biggest newspapers and magazines, the friendliest bloggers and, with pointed exceptions, the most influential tech sites.

Walt Mossberg, The Wall Street Journal: The iPhone Takes to the Big Screen. "The world's most popular smartphone becomes significantly faster, thinner and lighter this week, while gaining a larger, 4-inch screen—all without giving up battery life, comfort in the hand and high-quality construction."

David Pogue, The New York Times: IPhone 5 Scores Well, with a Quibble. "Apple calls its [charging connector] replacement the Lightning connector. It's much sturdier than the old jack, and much smaller — 0.31 inch wide instead of 0.83. And there's no right side up — you can insert it either way. It clicks satisfyingly into place, yet you can remove it easily. It's the very model of a modern major connector. Well, great. But it doesn't fit any existing accessories, docks or chargers. Apple sells an adapter plug for $30 (or $40 with an eight-inch cable "tail"). If you have a few accessories, you could easily pay $150 in adapters for a $200 phone. That's not just a slap in the face to loyal customers — it's a jab in the eye."

Ed Baig, USA Today: Apple iPhone 5 in front of the smartphone pack. "When Apple introduced the iPhone 4S last October, you could sense the initial disappointment. Many people were longing for an iPhone 5. The iPhone 4S that came instead may not have represented a dramatic upgrade, but it was a snappy handset with an excellent camera and a sometimes-obedient virtual digital assistant named Siri. It went on to become the best-selling iPhone to date. Nearly a year later the iPhone 5 is upon us. And what I detect this time is lust."

Peter Nowak, CBCNews: iPhone 5 not terribly innovative, but still a smart package. "Devices running iOS 6 will thus have Apple's new Maps app, which isn't as good as its Google-based predecessor. The new app is functional and includes transit stops, but these are incomplete. While there are plenty of streetcar stops marked in Toronto, for example, some subway stations are inexplicably missing. Real-time traffic data, for Toronto at least, is also almost non-existent. It also doesn't include Google's popular Street View, so you can't swoop down to take a pedestrian-level view of locations... If Apple allows it, Google is likely to release its own map app for iOS 6 and fight it out for supremacy."

Harry McCracken, Time: It's all about refinement. "Apple's mojo remains fully operational. The iPhone 5 features some upgrades which, though not groundbreaking in the least, are welcome, like its slightly-larger screen and zippy 4G LTE broadband. It sports an improved version of what was already the single best camera in phonedom. It makes Siri smarter. In short, it's the most polished version yet of what was already easily the most polished phone on the market."

Rich Jaroslovsky, Bloomberg: IPhone 5 Gets Bigger, Thinner, Faster. "The result is a phone that's compact and feather-weight, yet, thanks to the materials used in its aluminum-and-glass body, conveys a sense of solidity and feels great in the hand. It also comes with newly redesigned headphones called EarPods that are the first ever from Apple that don't either immediately fall out of my ears, hurt or both."

Stuart Miles, Pocket Lint: The best iPhone yet? "It's the same iPhone, but it's completely different. That's the main takeaway point for the iPhone 5's design. It's something you can't really appreciate until you get up close and personal with the new phone, but when you do, wow, you'll really notice that difference."

TechCrunch's MG Siegler: With iPhone 5, Apple Has Chiseled The Smartphone To Near Perfection. "You pick it up and it almost feels fake. That's not to say it feels cheap; because it doesn't — quite the opposite, actually. It just doesn't seem real. Certainly not to someone who has been holding the iPhone 4/4S for the past two years. It feels like someone took one of those devices and hollowed it out."

Jim Dalrymple, The Loop: Review: iPhone 5. "That has been my takeaway from the design of the iPhone 5 — small design changes that make for big user experience improvements. It's important to remember that while the changes on the outside may be small to the naked eye, the changes on the inside are huge. Every major component of the iPhone has been changed in one way or another."

Scott Stein, CNET: Finally, the iPhone we've always wanted. "The good: The iPhone 5 adds everything we wanted in the iPhone 4S: 4G LTE, a longer, larger screen, and a faster A6 processor. Plus, its top-to-bottom redesign is sharp, slim, and feather-light. The bad: Sprint and Verizon models can't use voice and data simultaneously. The smaller connector renders current accessories unusable without an adapter. There's no NFC, and the screen size pales in comparison to jumbo Android models. The bottom line: The iPhone 5 completely rebuilds the iPhone on a framework of new features and design, addressing its major previous shortcomings. It's absolutely the best iPhone to date, and it easily secures its place in the top tier of the smartphone universe."

Luke Peters, T3: iPhone 5 Review: "Because various components have been reduced in size, the headphone socket has been moved to the bottom of the device, which comes with its pros and cons. On the plus side, your phone usually goes in your pocket nose first, which means the headphone cable has a clear run out to your ears. On the downside, the jutting jack interferes with your hand when holding it 'upright'. Not all apps will use the gyroscope to flip the screen 180-degrees, either, so you'll have to get used to that."

Mark Prigg, Mail Online: 'Bright, responsive and it just feels right.' "The iPhone 5 is also able to support superfast 4G networks, but unfortunately we were unable to test this as they have not yet launched in the UK. You'll also need a new, smaller SIM card known as a nanosim to use the phone - but most operators should have these in stock when the handset goes on sale."

Tim Stevens, Engadget: iPhone 5 Review. "Thinner. Lighter. Faster. Simpler. The moment the iPhone 5 was unveiled we knew that it was checking off all the right boxes, folding in all the improvements and refinements people have been demanding over the past year -- yet plenty of folks still went to their respective social networks to type out their bitter disappointment. iPhone upgrade ennui seemed to be sweeping the nation, a sentiment that appeared to quickly dissipate when it came time for people to vote with their wallets."

John Gruber, Daring Fireball: The iPhone 5. "The meta story surrounding the iPhone 5 is the same as that of the iPhone 4S a year ago: a gaping chasm between consumers so excited to buy it that they stay up until (or wake up in) the middle of the night to pre-order it, and on the other side, a collective yawn from the gadget and tech press. That story a year ago was lost amid the tributes to Steve Jobs, who died the day after the 4S was unveiled. If anything, that chasm is growing. The collective yawn from the tech press was louder this year; the enthusiasm from consumers is stronger."

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/7wyUJ0yuXZk/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.04 | 0 komentar | Read More

Microsoft hires TV exec to boost original content

The iPhone 5 reviewed; Yahoo giving shareholders $3.65 billion.

iPhone 5 review: Finally, the iPhone we've always wanted [CNET]

Well, guess what? Now it has 4G LTE and...well, maybe not a giant screen, but a larger screen. That's not all, though: the already great camera's been subtly improved, speakerphone and noise-canceling quality has been tweaked, and -- as always -- iOS 6 brings a host of other improvements, including baked-in turn-by-turn navigation, a smarter Siri, and Passbook, a location-aware digital wallet app for storing documents like gift cards, boarding passes, and tickets.

The question is: a full year later, is that enough? For me, it is. I don't want much more in my smartphone. Sure, I'd love a new magical technology to sink my teeth into, but not at the expense of being useful. Right now, I'm not sure what that technology would even be.

With Hollywood hire, Microsoft bolsters entertainment efforts [THE NEW YORK TIMES]

Ms. Tellem will oversee a Microsoft production studio based in Los Angeles that will create both traditional "linear" programming and interactive programming that fuses video and gamelike content, they said. She will report to Phil Spencer, the corporate vice president of Microsoft Studios, part of the Microsoft entertainment division that oversees the company's Xbox console.

Yahoo to give shareholders $3.65 billion, Mayer explains why in leaked memo [BUSINESS INSIDER]

Yahoo will be keeping $650 million.

"This outcome is terrific for Yahoo," writes Mayer.

"It generates liquidity to create substantial value for our shareholders, while retaining a meaningful amount in the company to invest in our future."

"Also, because we still own 23 percent of Alibaba's common stock, we have the opportunity to benefit from future upside when Alibaba IPOs."

Rethink Robotics Inc. introduced Tuesday a low-cost—and cute—robot named Baxter that can do such factory chores as picking parts off a conveyor belt, so long as they don't weigh more than five to 10 pounds. ... Boston-based Rethink, founded in 2008, said Baxter eliminates the need to hire specialist technicians. Rodney Brooks, chairman of Rethink, said most workers would be able to learn to operate Baxter within half an hour. Rethink touts the robot as appealing for small and midsize manufacturers that previously haven't been able to afford robots and lacked the expertise to program them.

While conventional wisdom may hold that YouTube videos are amateurish and unprofitable compared to television, Maker Studios is making inroads to prove that wrong

Maker is one of a phalanx of new web-video powers, joining Machinima, FullScreen and Big Frame in pioneering the field. They aid prominent YouTubers in production, marketing and merchandise, while also amassing networks of and selling advertising for other YouTube channels.

Don't miss the latest tech news. Sign up now to get Today in Tech emailed every morning.

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/GO8I7AwQZNY/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.04 | 0 komentar | Read More

The greening of the football stadium

By Brian Dumaine, senior editor-at-large

A ring of solar-powered LEDs atop MetLife Stadium flashes New York Giants blue.

A ring of solar-powered LEDs atop MetLife Stadium flashes New York Giants blue.

FORTUNE -- A new kind of NFL rivalry is forming, not on the gridiron but in the boardroom. Many NFL owners have suddenly gotten religion about the environmental impact of football: installing solar panels in their stadiums, recycling plastic cups, and even composting garbage. Philadelphia Eagles owner Jeffrey Lurie wants to make his venue an environmental showcase. New York Giants co-owner Don Mara says he wants "to have the greenest stadium in the NFL." Jonathan Kraft, whose family owns the New England Patriots, says: "We hope to lead the way in sustainability."

MORE: Can the Navy really go green?

It's not just altruism that's driving these business titans. Their plans will help the bottom line. Take the solar systems the Patriots, Giants, Jets, Redskins, and others are installing. About a year and a half ago, David Crane, CEO of the New Jersey-based energy provider NRG (NRG), approached the NFL about converting to renewable energy. NRG, with $9 billion in revenue and a fleet of coal, gas, and nuclear power plants, says he believes that solar will be a disruptive technology. The problem, explains Crane, is that solar, which still counts for less than 1% of U.S. power production, wasn't gaining any traction. If he could get the NFL to embrace solar, he could use America's most popular sport to help spread the word. His pitch: At no capital expense to the NFL owners, NRG would install panels at their facilities. For the deal at Foxborough, Mass., one of seven NFL locales NRG is wiring, the Patriots get to hedge against rising electricity prices by locking into a long-term fixed-price contract. NRG profits from the cash flow. The utility has installed nearly a megawatt of solar panels, enough to supply 60% of the power for the stores and restaurants in the complex.

NFL games still consume lots of power and create lots of waste. But owners say solar is just a first step in a long drive toward sustainability. No word yet on harnessing the energy from the on-field tackles.

This story is from the September 24, 2012 issue of Fortune.

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/4QIvGhVktu4/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.04 | 0 komentar | Read More

Japan Airlines has second largest IPO of the year

Written By Emdua on Selasa, 18 September 2012 | 21.26

A Japan Airlines jetliner taking off from the Haneda International airport in Tokyo.

HONG KONG (CNNMoney) -- Japan Airlines took another step toward redemption Wednesday as it was re-listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange almost three years after a blockbuster bankruptcy.

The IPO was expected to raise $8.5 billion at the initial offering price of 3,790 yen a share.

But demand was weaker than some observers had expected, and shares failed to move much above the initial offering price despite a relatively conservative valuation.

Still, the IPO is the second largest of the year, trailing only that of Facebook, which raised $16 billion at its initial $38 per share May offering. That breathlessly hyped IPO turned into a huge Wall Street debacle, with lots of confusion -- and lawsuits -- swirling around. Shares of Facebook (FB) were trading under $22 a share Tuesday.

The Japan Airlines offering attracted little of the fanfare associated with the Facebook IPO -- but some analysts had predicted a strong performance from the stock in its first day of trading.

Yet shares of the Tokyo-based air carrier were up only about 1% in early trading on Wednesday.

Even without a big pop in share price, the airline's return to trading is notable.

In 2010, the carrier collapsed under a mountain of debt accumulated by ballooning pensions and unprofitable flights.

After filing for bankruptcy, the airline underwent severe cutbacks. The state-backed Enterprise Turnaround Initiative Corp. of Japan was forced to provide financing, pensions were slashed and the workforce reduced.

The company has worked feverishly to overhaul itself and improve its balance sheet. The airline instituted severe cost-cutting measures and cites a corporate culture focused on saving as a reason for its more recent success. To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 11:16 PM ET

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/2dk0sjvU1C8/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
21.26 | 0 komentar | Read More

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings joins wealth giveaway

Netflix CEO Reed Hastings and his wife, Patty Quillin, recently signed the Giving Pledge.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Netflix CEO Reed Hastings is one of the latest bigwigs to promise half of his family's wealth to charity through the Giving Pledge, a two-year-old initiative championed by Warren Buffett and Bill and Melinda Gates.

Hastings and his wife, Patty Quillin, are among the 11 families that signed the Giving Pledge in September, according to a press release on Tuhesday. The pledge now covers 92 families.

The Giving Pledge doesn't specify how the participants will donate their money, though the press release noted that Hastings and Quillin "are active in educational philanthropy and politics with a specific focus on charter schools." Hastings was the president of the California State Board of Education from 2000 to 2004.

Netflix (NFLX) spokesman Joris Evers wouldn't discuss any of Hastings' specific favorite charities, saying that "we actually keep charitable giving and other activities that are not related to work very separate here at Netflix." He did add that Hastings is "very much into education."

"We are thrilled to join with other fortunate people to pledge a majority of our assets to be invested in others," Hastings and Quillin wrote in a letter posted on the Giving Pledge's website. "We hope through this community that we can learn as we go, and do our best to make a positive difference for many."

Hastings has made a fortune in Silicon Valley, but he's a comparative pauper in the Giving Pledge ranks. The initiative says it is "specifically focused on billionaires" -- a group Hastings appears to be a fair way off from joining. He doesn't appear on Forbes' Billionaires List, and his public stock holdings are in the multi-million range.

Related story: Private equity boss signs Giving Pledge

Hastings controls around 4.4% of Netflix's shares, including stock options, according to the company's most recent annual disclosure. That stake is worth about $144 million as of Monday's closing price.

He's also an active investor in tech startups and venture funds, and owns millions' worth of stock in both Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) and Facebook (FB). Hastings is on the board of directors for both companies.

Still, Gates and Buffett aren't about to turn away any donors with a mere nine-digit net worth. The Giving Pledge's mission statement says it "borrows from past and present efforts that encourage and recognize givers of all financial means and backgrounds."

The list of tech luminaries who have taken the pledge also includes Intel (INTC, Fortune 500) cofounder Gordon Moore, Facebook (FB) cofounders Dustin Moskovitz and Mark Zuckerberg, Tesla (TSLA) cofounder Elon Musk, Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) cofounder Paul Allen, AOL (AOL) founder Steve Case and Oracle (ORCL, Fortune 500) cofounder Larry Ellison. To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 2:04 PM ET

19 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/rCwNKS4Aigk/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
11.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

Kohl's to hire more than 50,000

Kohl's is hiring 52,700 seasonal part-time workers, a jump of 10% from the prior holiday shopping season.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Kohl's Department Stores seems to have high hopes for the upcoming holiday shopping season.

The retail chain unveiled plans on Tuesday to hire 52,700 seasonal workers this year. That's a 10% jump in seasonal hiring compared to last year, according to Kohl's (KSS, Fortune 500).

The department store chain plans to hire, on average, 41 workers per store, an increase of 4% from last year. in In total, Kohl's has 1,146 stores nationwide.

The company, based in Menomonee Falls, Wis., also plans to hire 5,700 seasonal employees at its distribution centers and another 30 seasonal positions in "credit operations."

Kohl's said the jobs are part-time, ranging from "a few hours to more that 20 hours per week." Many of the jobs consist of unloading trucks, stocking and working the cash registers. Hiring has begun, and the company plans to fill all job openings by mid-November.

Related: 7 hot toys for the holidays

Koh's announced its hiring drive as the economy continues to struggle with persistent unemployment.

Hiring ahead of the holiday shopping season is an important barometer of retailer confidence, though Kohl's did not say anything specific about its retail expectations for this year.

Major retailers like Wal-Mart (WMT, Fortune 500) and Toys R Us have offered layaway plans this year or eliminated fees on existing plans, in an effort to drum up business.

To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 11:31 AM ET

18 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/xpCWhbhFDk8/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
09.15 | 0 komentar | Read More

Bankers nabbed in bid-rigging scandal

A picture taken on September 18, 2011 shows a sign of the Swiss banking giant UBS in Lausanne.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A federal crackdown is proceeding quietly against bankers accused of systematically defrauding states, local governments and non-profits.

Since 2009, federal authorities have secured 19 convictions or guilty pleas as part of the investigation, including seven since April. The cases have put a spotlight on the municipal bond market, an esoteric corner of the finance world where prosecutors say Wall Street firms have repeatedly used inside information to pad their bottom lines at the public's expense.

"[T]hese complex, seemingly uninteresting backroom deals have a real impact on taxpayers," Richard Weber, head of the Internal Revenue Service's criminal division, said following the convictions of three UBS (UBS) bankers last month.

Those implicated over the course of the investigation have come from firms including Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), JPMorgan (JPM, Fortune 500) and General Electric (GE, Fortune 500). Government agencies have collected more than $740 million in penalties, restitution and other fees from the institutions involved.

The probe targets bankers who have colluded about the offers they've made as they bid on contracts to invest municipal bond proceeds.

How the market works: State and local governments issue municipal bonds to fund things like road construction and school repairs. In some cases, they issue the bonds on behalf of non-profits or companies that will spend the money on projects benefiting the public.

The market for these bonds is massive, with more than $3.7 trillion outstanding as of the beginning of this year, according to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Governments and other issuers don't typically spend all the proceeds from their bonds right away, instead investing some of the money and holding it for future expenditures.

To figure out how to invest that money, they hire brokers who advise on and manage a bidding process among financial institutions competing for their business. Bids are solicited from firms like UBS and JPMorgan, which submit the interest rates they're willing to offer on the bond proceeds.

Related: UBS whistleblower nets $104 million reward

How it goes bad: In cases like that of the UBS executives, prosecutors say the process was corrupted when bankers from different firms conspired with one another, dividing up business in advance and devising their bids in cooperation, a practice known as bid-rigging. This allowed the winning bidders to offer issuers lower rates of return than they would have secured through an honest process.

In some instances, the firms serving as brokers also got in on the act, accepting kickbacks in exchange for providing certain bidders with information about other submissions.

Investigators have been aided in building their cases by the fact that many of the institutions involved record employee phone calls, said Doug Leff, assistant special agent in charge of the FBI's New York field office. The challenge, he added, has been decoding the jargon the bankers used to hatch their schemes.

"They use certain codes -- in some ways, they're almost like the mafia or the drug dealers, except what they're trading in is much more sophisticated," he said.

A UBS spokeswoman said the bank "exited the municipal investment and derivatives business in 2008," and noted that it had reached a $160 million settlement with the government last year to resolve the issue. Other banks either declined to comment or did not respond to requests for comment.

Taxpayers take a hit: Leff said it was impossible to say precisely how much state and local governments have lost as a result of the bid-rigging, but said it was "fair to say it's in the hundreds of millions, if not billions" of dollars.

The investigation of the issue began more than three years ago and remains ongoing. The deals under scrutiny in some cases date back to the late 1990s.

The controversy bears some similarities to the Libor interest-rate-fixing scandal, in which banks are accused of manipulating key global rates used as benchmarks for everything from auto loans to adjustable-rate mortgages. A number of local governments with complex investments tied to Libor say they lost money as a result.

In the bid-rigging cases, victims range from the state of Massachusetts to a hospital in New Jersey to New Mexico's official student loan foundation.

"These defendants chose to line their pockets to other peoples' disadvantage, people who really needed these services," Leff said. To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 10:13 AM ET

18 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/gVJedksZQek/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.45 | 0 komentar | Read More

Apple stock tops $700

Click the chart to track Apple's stock.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Apple's stock hit a new high early Tuesday, crossing $700 for the first time and marking yet another milestone for a company that has had plenty of them this year.

The stock hit an record high of $701.44 in morning trading.

The tech giant's stock has risen sharply in the past few weeks in anticipation of the unveiling of the iPhone 5. The smartphone's launch last Wednesday impressed consumers and investors alike: The company raked in a record 2 million pre-orders in the first 24 hours, double the 1 million first-day orders recorded last year by the iPhone 4S.

Last month, Apple (AAPL, Fortune 500) became the most valuable company of all time when its market capitalization soared past $619 billion -- the record Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) had held since December 1999. Apple's market cap is now $656 billion.

With new gadgets on the horizon, including the iPhone 5, the new iPad, and yet-to-be-announced gizmos like the iPad mini and a long-awaited Apple TV update, Apple has crossed the $400 billion, $500 billion and $600 billion marks -- all in 2012 -- as the stock has soared 80% this year.

The astronomical rise isn't entirely without merit. Apple's iPhone business alone now brings in more money than Microsoft. Even the iPad, which was intended to be a gap-filling product between the iPhone and the Macintosh, has itself become a multi-billion dollar product for Apple.

Analysts scramble to keep their targets ahead of Apple's price

Yet some caution that the stock is rising too quickly and is in danger of becoming overvalued.

Apple's stock is now trading at 16 times fiscal 2013 earnings estimates, which isn't all that expensive compared to some other tech companies with wild triple-digit price-to-earnings ratios, such as Amazon (AMZN, Fortune 500) and Facebook (FB). But its share price has been outpacing earnings expectations by a long shot -- shares were trading at 12 times future earnings forecasts as recently as February.

Still, investors aren't shying away. Apple has begun putting that $117 billion in cash to good use, paying out a sizable dividend to shareholders.

So how much higher can Apple's stock soar? Much will likely depend on how much future product releases impress. But with a product lineup that is expected to smash through more sales records, Apple's shares see no signs of letting up. To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 10:06 AM ET

18 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/Jos4cFGf7Wo/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
07.45 | 0 komentar | Read More

Lacrosse by Jake

Jake Steinfeld on the sidelines of a Major League Lacrosse game

(Fortune) -- In November of 1977, Jake Steinfeld, a freshman lacrosse player at the State University of New York at Cortland, was standing on a field in the hail. "What am I doing?" he wondered. It was freezing, and he saw no future in the sport. So Steinfeld -- a weightlifting enthusiast since age 13 -- dropped out, moved to Northridge, Calif., and became a bodybuilder.

After winning a few small competitions, he moved over to Studio City and fell into a routine: lifting weights in the morning, working as a bouncer at night. Sandra Will, an actress, approached him one day and told him she needed someone to help her get in shape for a commercial. He trained her, she told friends about his services, and word spread. Among many other big names, Steinfeld worked with Steven Spielberg -- who later hired him to help Harrison Ford train to play Indiana Jones -- and named his company Body By Jake. He offered personal training by appointment, exercise videos, and eventually TV spots.

Steinfeld milked his Hollywood connections, grew the business, and in 1993 launched a 24-hour network, FitTV, with Tim Robertson, son of televangelist Pat. In 1998, Steinfeld sold FitTV to News Corp. (NWSA, Fortune 500) for an undisclosed figure. He had money, recognizable celebrity, and an itch to try a new venture. His mind returned to those freezing lacrosse practices.

He had read about Dave Morrow, an All-American lacrosse player who founded Warrior, a lacrosse equipment and apparel maker. On a whim Steinfeld called Morrow to persuade him to create a professional lacrosse league. No such thing existed. "He just called me out of the blue," Morrow says. "It was a 310 number so I thought it was one of my old teammates messing with me. When I called back, someone answered and said, 'This is Craig from Body By Jake,' and I almost hung up the phone." Morrow didn't, and within minutes the gregarious Body By Jake guy had convinced him.

More: Steal bases, snag sponsors?

The two former laxers, along with Robertson, funded Major League Lacrosse (MLL) by themselves. But by the end of the first season, in 2000, MLL was out of money, Steinfeld says. The trio scrounged for years. A turning point came in 2004: Morrow sold Warrior to New Balance, and its owner, Jim Davis, bought a controlling stake in the league, saving it.

Today, the league has just wrapped up its 12th season, with its championship match played on August 26 at Harvard Stadium in Boston. While the MLL is growing nicely, many American sports fans still aren't aware that pro lacrosse even exists. Dave Gross, MLL commissioner, says that's to be expected -- it seems that creating a sports league from scratch is not easy. "We are not going to be an overnight success," he says, "but nothing in sports happens that way. We're not the NFL; we're not even the MLS at this point. But we're growing it in the right way."

Mike Stone, a midfielder for the Boston Cannons (2011 champions), says recognition isn't why the players are in it anyway. "Right now, with the state of the MLL, you're doing this because you love the sport," he says. "We all know nobody is making a killing at it, and it's a grind for everybody." Indeed, pros make only $13,000, on average, per season; thus they all have regular jobs. The season is short -- 13 weeks -- and falls in summer. Still, guys like Stone get paid to do what they love, all thanks to Steinfeld, whose name graces the playoffs trophy.

More: How the NBA dominates pro sports

The Body By Jake boss is now focusing his time on beefing up the league's size and reach: He helped launch the program Inside the MLL, which began airing this season on CBS Sports Network. He has people working on technology that will make it easier for a casual fan to watch the sport. TV footage will now highlight the player who has the ball, much like in video games, and akin to what Fox tried to do with pro hockey when it highlighted the zooming puck in the late 90s.

The MLL has sponsorship deals with beverage bigs like Powerade, Coke Zero, and Bud Light. This year two expansion teams debuted: the Charlotte Hounds and the Ohio Machine. The latter, in a June game against the Denver Outlaws, pulled a crowd of 30,128, the biggest in MLL history. And it will continue to expand: The MLL plans to add two more teams in Florida, Texas, or Atlanta by 2014. After that, it's shooting for four new teams on the West Coast, which would bring the total to 14.

"We're getting close," Steinfeld hopes, "to the tipping point." And Hollywood still beckons: Lionsgate bought Take a Shot!, a book by Steinfeld and Morrow about creating the league, with plans to make it into a TV Drama series.

On starting a company

Dive in. "Don't get ready, don't get set. Just go," Steinfeld says on starting his league. "Sometimes the smartest people are the most paralyzed."

Find people you trust. "People you know will always have your back, not when you're standing on top of the mountain but in the deepest ditch."

Constantly adapt. "Keep reinventing yourself; that's the only way you survive. Also, it's important for your sanity."

A shorter version of this story originally appeared in the September 24, 2012 issue of Fortune. To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 6:06 AM ET

18 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/27Lyko_F4nU/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.46 | 0 komentar | Read More

3 strategies to dominate a scary economy

By Geoff Colvin, senior editor-at-large

General Mills headquarters

General Mills headquarters in Minneapolis

FORTUNE -- Gloom has become a menace. The drumbeat of distressing news -- Europe, the fiscal cliff, China -- is enough to rob anyone of hope. It's a nasty, insidious force that's undermining the native optimism that buoys up businesspeople everywhere.

Resist! The reality is that even in today's uncertain economy, some companies are winning big. Growth and success are always possible if we adapt to the times. Three strategies are helping smart companies dominate.

They manage for value -- not for EPS, Ebitda, gross margin, revenue, cash, or anything else. That sounds obvious, but in difficult times, managers get seduced into value-destroying moves. For example, accounting rules say that R&D and marketing are expenses, so if you cut them -- and they're easy to cut -- reported profit jumps. Who doesn't want higher profits now? But in reality those costs are investments that pay off for years, so cutting them destroys value.

A company that understands that is Qualcomm (QCOM), maker of the chips that power mobile phones. In the recession its profits fell in 2008, then fell sharply in 2009 -- yet the company increased R&D, sometimes substantially, every year through the downturn and beyond. The complaint that mindlessly short-term-obsessed investors punish such behavior just isn't valid; Qualcomm's stock has been surging for more than three years.

Other companies manage for value in other ways. Intel (INTC) launched billions of dollars in new plant construction when its industry was on life support and credit markets were traumatized. Coca-Cola (KO) never let up on brand building. Those companies are thriving.

They keep developing human capital. Every company claims that "people are our most important asset," but few mean it. In tough times most companies slack off on leadership development. Training costs money, and moving high-potential managers into developmental assignments feels like a luxury that can wait for better times. But the best-performing companies know that human capital truly is a business's most valuable asset, the scarcest resource, no matter what kind of business it is. Look at highflying IBM (IBM), No. 1 in our latest ranking of the world's top companies for leadership development. It hasn't even considered cutting back its Corporate Service Corps, which sends teams of promising employees around the world to work with local organizations on local problems. Former CEO Sam Palmisano liked to observe that calling IBM a hardware or software or services company was wrong in each case. "We're a people company," he said. Or consider General Mills (GIS), prospering in the fiercely competitive food industry. Its famously demanding leadership culture hasn't wavered, and the company ranks No. 21 on Glassdoor.com's new list of the 25 companies where it's hardest to get hired.

They get radically customer-centric. Most companies don't even know what that means. They have no idea how much money they make or lose with each customer, and they don't craft genuinely different offers for different customers or customer segments based on those customers' needs. But top-performing companies do.

Amazon (AMZN) is the reigning champ, achieving its long-declared goal of being "Earth's most customer-centric company"; the stock just keeps climbing. In a much different industry, Wells Fargo (WFC) has become America's most valuable bank, with a customer-centric strategy since 2003. Wharton professor Peter Fader notes that "the average Wells Fargo household has over five different bank products, roughly twice the industry average."

These three strategies are a bit contrarian in today's world. Following them demands courage. Fear not. They work. Be brave, adopt them with enthusiasm, march confidently into the gloom, and smile.

This story is from the September 24, 2012 issue of Fortune.

18 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/vlWp8y-P3u4/
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

What it takes to be 'Made in USA'

Athletic shoe maker New Balance says stamping Made in USA on its labels draws in customers.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- With so much talk about the need to revive U.S. manufacturing and create jobs, more companies are touting their American-made roots in order to lure customers.

The notion that buying something made domestically will boost the economy has become an article of faith during the economic crisis. And many businesses are trying to capitalize on that by attaching a "Made in USA" label to their products.

Buying American-made goods has become personal, according to Dave Schiff, chief creative officer at Made Movement, a website that markets and sells only American-made products. Shoppers believe that supporting businesses that manufacture domestically could help them in return.

People are looking for "Made in USA" labels because they know that's how jobs are created, he said. They think, "My son who is unemployed could benefit if I pay attention to a label. The economy at large gets a shot in the arm."

But before a company can use the iconic label, it must comply with a complex set of rules that dictates its use.

The Federal Trade Commission has a dizzying 44-page rulebook that lays out the guidelines -- and the specifics are enough to make your head spin.

For instance, domestically-made textiles, wool, fur or automobiles must, by law, have a "Made in USA" label. Companies aren't required to disclose country of origin for most other products, but many choose to tout their American-made status in order to appeal to customers.

Companies looking for that boost from the label have to be able to prove that their final products are assembled or processed in the United States, according to the FTC. The agency doesn't spot-check items that claim to be made in the United States, but it does investigate complaints.

Related: 7 hot Made-in-the-USA toys for the holidays

Of course, many manufacturers now rely on global supply chains, which makes it much harder to determine when a company can rightly make the claim. Regulators try to assess how much of a product's total manufacturing cost comes from the United States.

For goods that have parts made in many different countries, the FTC relies on what it calls a "one step removed" rule. For instance, if a shirt is made with fabric from overseas, but sewn together in the United States, it can't be labeled "Made in USA."

But if a manufacturer uses U.S.-made fabric that is sewn together domestically using thread made overseas, it would be permitted to use the "Made in the USA" label.

Companies that can't get all of their component parts domestically can use what the FTC calls qualified "Made in USA" claims, such as "Made in USA from imported parts" or "Assembled in the USA."

Related: The manufacturing jobs boom is for real

While the distinctions may be minor, a failure to follow the rules can cost businesses a ton of money.

If the FTC finds a label to be deceptive, it can file a lawsuit and ask for a court-ordered fine or consumer redress. According to Matt Wilshire, an FTC staff attorney, fines go as high as $16,000 per mislabeled item sold, or for every day that the item was advertised.

"This could become a very large figure very quickly," he said, citing one case that ended up costing a business nearly $400,000 in fines.

As costly as a labeling mistake could be, many feel like the regulations protect smaller businesses in the long run.

Brian Meck, who co-owns Fessler USA, a private-label manufacturer that makes clothing for retailers like Urban Outfitters (URBN), says that the regulations reward companies who pay higher costs to manufacture domestically by safeguarding the Made in USA claim. Without the rules, he said, big brands could benefit from the label while sourcing cheaper imported materials to cut costs, without anyone knowing the difference.

Meck also said that the regulations not only protect businesses, but also help consumers. "They give [consumers] the ability to know where their dollars are going and what they're really supporting."

Related: Best Places to Launch

For New Balance Athletic Shoe, which is the last U.S.- made athletic footwear brand, the pros of manufacturing domestically outweigh the drawbacks.

"From a cost perspective, you add different burdens -- regulatory schemes, wage and benefits -- compared to competitors," said spokesman Matt LeBretton. "But the feedback that we get is pretty outstanding, so we do everything to make that continue to work." To top of page

First Published: September 18, 2012: 5:48 AM ET

18 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/_2E3-4SplVQ/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
03.14 | 0 komentar | Read More

Tesla may need to slow down electric car production

Written By Emdua on Senin, 17 September 2012 | 08.15

Tesla is ramping up production of electric cars such as its Model S. But one investing strategist is worried that Tesla is boosting production too quickly.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- John J. Licata is the founder and chief energy strategist for Blue Phoenix Inc., an independent research and consulting company focused on next generation energy. Neither Licata nor his firm has an investing position in Tesla Motors.

Tesla is showing that is getting the knack for making cars. At least that is what one can infer from a recent tweet by chairman and CEO Elon Musk.

Over the weekend, Musk said the luxury electric vehicle maker made 100 vehicle bodies for the first time in the company's history. I want Tesla (TSLA) to succeed but I do have concerns. How can a very young automaker, one so meticulous in its efforts to make the perfect car, actually boost production levels at such a fast rate in the next few months and still maintain its high standards?

Let's look in the review mirror. During the company's most recent earnings call, Musk said Tesla made 10 vehicles per week (40 in total). Musk also gave Wall Street some meat to chew on by declaring Tesla would dramatically increase production in the coming months. Still, Musk's, declaration via Twitter that Tesla made 100 vehicles may turn some heads. Some analysts were thinking Tesla's production would jump to only 40 vehicles a week.

Shares of Tesla were up 5% Monday morning. In addition to the production news, the stock got a lift from an upgrade by analysts at Morgan Stanley.

Looking at the road ahead though, producing 100 vehicles a week shows the company's huge ramp-up in production timetable may be happening earlier than expected. Yet more work needs to be done in short order for the company to produce enough vehicles to be above the 20,000 per year production clip the company has been aiming for. Musk has stated that by 2013, Tesla will boost production to "at least 20,000 units".

Tesla Model S review: A good first impression

In fact, to meet that goal Tesla would have to produce over 400 cars a week by the fourth quarter. At the current rate of 100 units per week, Tesla would be on a path to produce just 5,200 cars a year. So the company would have to nearly quadruple its production rate to meet the 20,000 a year goal.

Going from producing 10 cars a week to over 400 in two quarters is quite monumental for any car company, never mind an automaker that is as young as Tesla. That could mean quality control will become a sticky situation. With such a robust growth rate in store for Tesla, I think Musk would be challenged to inspect many of the cars himself (as he tries to do now) and simultaneously maintain full responsibilities as the CEO.

So Tesla may need to downshift its rapid growth rate from 5th gear if the electric car company wants to maintain high quality control standards. Musk may also want to focus more on just being Tesla's chairman and bring in a seasoned auto veteran as CEO to oversee the daily operations of the company at this stage of the company's life cycle.

With two crossovers, a more affordable sedan, second generation Roadster and the Model S planned for the next three years, Musk may have too much to handle. And investors might be getting just a little too excited given that Tesla is still losing money. To top of page

First Published: September 17, 2012: 11:01 AM ET

17 Sep, 2012


-
Source: http://rss.cnn.com/~r/rss/money_news_companies/~3/KmBp63b2N88/index.html
--
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com
08.15 | 0 komentar | Read More
techieblogger.com Techie Blogger Techie Blogger